Tips for the Undergraduate Thesis Presentation

This is a summary of some concrete ideas I have collected from my experience as a teacher, researcher, and supervisor of several undergraduate and graduate final projects, to help deliver a strong presentation of the thesis proposal and the final thesis.

Buy me a Coffee

Tips for Creating the Slides

  • Use large font
  • Little text, only write what is essential and important
  • If the graphics are too small to be seen (Do not use them)
  • If the text you are about to add is too small (Crop it until it looks large or remove it)
  • Use colors from the same color palette as the template
  • You deliver the presentation, not the slides
  • The evaluators should be focused on the presenter and only look at the slides when the presenter points to them or explains something on them as a visual aid
  • Do not read the slides
  • Be direct
  • Remember the Zen of Python
  • Enjoy the presentation! (This is the most important one)

Thesis Proposal Presentation

This can be used for any type of thesis project. The rule for the number of slides is 1 slide per 1 minute of presentation time.

Presentation time = 15 Minutes (Between 15-17 slides)

Slides

  1. Title, student and supervisor information
  2. Context
  3. Problem statement (a single paragraph)
  4. Justification
  5. Conceptual Framework (1/2)
  6. Conceptual Framework (2/2)
  7. State of the Art (1/2)
  8. State of the Art (2/2)
  9. Legal Framework
  10. General Objective (a single paragraph)
  11. Specific Objectives (Include Deliverables) (1/2)
  12. Specific Objectives (Include Deliverables) (2/2)
  13. Methodology
  14. Timeline
  15. Budget
  16. Bibliography

Evaluation Questions

Answer these questions to be clear about what the jury wants to know

  • Title:
    • Is the title clear and consistent with the topic and problem stated?
  • Problem:
    • Is the problem and the context in which it occurs clearly described?
    • Are the causes of the problem clearly described?
    • Is sufficient valid evidence presented for the existence of the problem and its causes?
  • Justification:
    • Are the benefits and the impact of carrying out the project clearly described?
  • Conceptual Framework:
    • Does the conceptual framework recognize the concepts related to the categories developed in the proposal?
    • Is the conceptual framework sufficiently supported by bibliographic and documentary sources?
  • State of the Art:
    • Does the state of the art reflect an understanding of the field, at least at the national level with reference to the international context?
    • Is the state of the art sufficiently supported by bibliographic and documentary sources?
  • Legal Framework:
    • Are the national and international regulations and/or standards related to the project’s topic examined?
  • General Objective:
    • Does the objective include an infinitive verb and clearly present what, how, and why the project is carried out?
    • Is the project title clearly related to the objective?
    • Does the objective offer a solution to the problem referenced in the project?
  • Specific Objectives:
    • Does each objective include an infinitive verb and clearly state what is to be accomplished?
    • Does each deliverable from the specific objectives contribute significantly to achieving the general objective, and do all of them together accomplish the general objective?
    • Are the objectives presented in chronological order?
  • Methodology:
    • Is there a close relationship between the specific objectives and the methodology phases?
    • Are the project phases and the activities needed to meet the objectives described?
    • Are the techniques, methods, tools, and instruments to be used in each phase described clearly and coherently, adding rigor to the work?
    • Are the project deliverable(s) the result of applied research or a case study?
  • Timeline:
    • Is the proposed timeline clear, consistent with the methodology, and does it propose a duration of 6 months?

Final Thesis Presentation

The slides explaining the methodology used (13-18) are in this case an example using the CRISP methodology used in data science.

Presentation time = 30 Minutes (Maximum limit of 30 slides)

Slides

This is a tentative outline of the slides that can be produced; some points require more slides, such as the study and understanding of the data and data analysis (Use tables with large numbers and large charts).

  1. Title, student and supervisor information
  2. Context
  3. Problem statement (a single paragraph)
  4. Justification
  5. Conceptual Framework (1/2)
  6. Conceptual Framework (2/2)
  7. Legal Framework
  8. State of the Art (1/2)
  9. State of the Art (2/2)
  10. General Objective (a single paragraph)
  11. Specific Objectives (1/2)
  12. Specific Objectives (2/2)
  13. Methodology (CRISP, only show the diagram and do not spend too much time on this)
  14. a. Business/Question Understanding
  15. b. Data study and understanding (What characteristics do the data have?)
  16. c. Data analysis and feature selection (What did you find particularly noteworthy in the data?)
  17. d. Modeling (Which models were used and why?)
  18. e. Evaluation (Which evaluation metric was chosen and why?)
  19. Final Results (Which model was selected and what are the most important features and why?)
  20. Deliverables obtained (evidence)
  21. Conclusions
  22. References

Evaluation Questions

Answer these questions

  • General Objective:

    • Was the objective achieved 100%?
    • What difficulties were encountered?
  • Specific Objectives:

    • How was each specific objective accomplished and what problems arose during development?
    • What deliverables were obtained?
  • Methodology:

    • How was each stage of the Methodology developed?
    • What problems arose and how were they solved?
  • Deliverables:

    • What deliverables were obtained from the project?
  • Conclusions:

    • What conclusions are drawn from the analysis of the results?
    • What lessons did the development of this project teach you?

References

Previous